Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirSwap (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AirSwap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable Crypto company. Got a couple of mentions in CNBC and Bloomberg when they were doing their offering, nothing substantial. Fails WP:NCORP MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep mentioned in a book and various news sources including NYT. Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 18:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- @User talk:Capankajsmilyo your source is not a peer reviewed or published book per se, it is the refereed proceedings of the First International Conference on Smart Blockchain. On top of this, it mentions Airswap in the most trivial of ways. No in depth coverage=no article. This is just another non notable coin that uses ethereum network. It has nothing to offer even if media outlets wanted to make it newsworthy. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing notable about this. Especially not being refereed to at some alt coin conference. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - passing mentions and promotional coverage doesn't meet WP:NCORP - David Gerard (talk) 09:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluidity (company), which is the same thing - David Gerard (talk) 09:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.